The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an appeal against a compensation award, rejecting admission due to the relatively small enhanced amount involved and upholding the lower court's moderation of the demand.
Appeal and civil application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL No. 143/2010 WITH
CIVIL APAPALICATION NO. 2993/2008 Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Aurangabad
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr. B.R. Survase, Advocate for appellant. Smt.S.D. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. Date : 5th July, 2010
PER COURT :
1 The appeal is not admitted mainly because the enhanced compensation is merely of Rs.21,120/-. Besides, the judgment has considered quite cogently the evidence put forth before it, and it has moderated demanded amount of Rs. 3,00,000/-. The appeal stands dismissed. 2 Civil application disposed of.
tsk/
Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Aurangabad
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
