regards reimbursement of the remuneration paid to the attendant employed by them. In the claim petition subject-matter of First Appeal No.128/2002, the appellant has examined one Devki as a witness, who was employed by the father of the appellant to look after the appellant when she was admitted in the hospital as indoor patient. She stated that she was paid a sum of Rs.2,800/- by the father of the appellant and she issued a receipt of having received the same. She stated that out of 17 days in the hospital, for a period of 3 days the appellant was in General Ward and 14 days in a Private Ward. The case of the appellant in First Appeal No.127 of 2002 is that she had engaged one Laxmi as an attendant and had paid a sum of Rs.3,000/- to her. The said Laxmi is not examined, but receipt issued by her has been exhibited. Looking to the nature of the injury sustained by both the appellants who are women, the case that the attendant was required to be engaged by them will have to be accepted. Even, according to the Doctor examined by the appellants, time of 6 to 8 weeks was required for recovery. Claim of only Rs.2,800/- and Rs.3,000/- has been made on account of charges of the attendants. The claim of Rs.2,800/- on the said count is reasonable and the same deserves to be allowed. Further a claim has been made on account conveyance charges. The
