The High Court extended the time to decide the reference by two months in First Appeal No. 104 of 2006 between Ganpatrao Shankarrao Gujave and the State of Maharashtra.
Time to decide the reference extended by two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2006
Ganpatrao Shankarrao Gujave & ors. … Appellants
v/s
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
… Respondents
None for the appellants.
Mr.A.R.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.
Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/by M/s.G.S.Hegde & Associates for Resp.No.2.
CORAM: A. S. OKA & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ.
DATED : 2ND JULY, 2012
P.C.:
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) ( A.S. OKA, J. )
1
Bhangale
Bhangale 2
Bhangale 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the reference needs to be decided within the original timeframe.
Whether the time for deciding the reference should be extended.
Ganpatrao Shankarrao Gujave
State of Maharashtra
A. S. Oka
Shrihari P. Davare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court