The High Court disposed of a civil revision application as withdrawn. The Court clarified the applicant could raise limitation defenses in their written statement for the trial.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CRA-342-09.sxw
Mhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 342 OF 2009
Kusum S. Navale ... Applicant vs. Baban S. Bhilare & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. P.G.Karande,Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, i/b. Vinod Jadhav,Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 8. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 15th September, 2010.
P.C.
The Revision Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
all the questions, including the question of limitation in the written statement and if that point is raised, the trial Court shall frame necessary issues and decide as per law.
Kusum S. Navale
Baban S. Bhilare
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
