The court disposed of a company winding-up petition as withdrawn after no claims were received in response to a published notice. The disposition was made with no order as to cost.
The Company Petition was disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp32-07
jpc/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 32 OF 2007
M/s Mysore Cement Pipes .. Petitioner Versus
M/s Tapi Prestressed Products Limited .. Respondent
Ms. Deepa Ahuja i/by Milind Jhatte for the Petitioner
Mr. Anupam Surve i/by Haresh Mehta & Co. for the Respondent
CORAM : S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 28th September, 2010
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner tenders an Affidavit dated 28th September, 2010 to prove the publication of the withdrawal of the Company Petition as ordered by this Court. The learned Advocate has further informed the Court that no claims are received from any creditor, contributory or any other person in response to the said advertisement.
2. The Company Petition is therefore disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to cost.
M/s Mysore Cement Pipes
M/s Tapi Prestressed Products Limited
S. J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
