The petitioner sought to withdraw the company petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Company petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
COMPANY PETITION NO. 125 OF 2010.
Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corporation Limited. ..Petitioner. v/s. Classic Flooring & Interiors Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr. Prakash Panjabi, a/w. Ms. Trupti Agrawal, i/b. Prakash Panjabi & Co., for Petitioner.
Mr. Birendra Saraf, a/w. Rajlaxmi Mohandas, a/w. Ms. Prachi Darda, i/b. ALMT Legal, for Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2010.
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the Company Petition, with liberty to file a fresh Petition.
Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corporation Limited
Classic Flooring & Interiors Pvt. Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
