A single-paragraph order disposing of an application for early hearing in a writ petition filed by a petitioner about to retire, noting the matter awaits final decision on benefits. Application disposed with liberty.
Civil Application disposed with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 990 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3096 OF 2008
Mrs.Indira S. Salunkhe .... Petitioner vs The President, Shri Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha .... Respondents
Mr. Surel S. Shah for the petitioner.
Mr. P. D. Dalvi for respondents 1 and 2.
Mr.A.P. Vanarase, AGP for respondents 3 and 4.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 16th April, 2010
P.C.:
1 This is an application for early hearing in a writ petition of the year 2008
on the ground that the petitioner is about to retire by May 2010. This itself cannot be the reason to grant application as the matter is already admitted and in fact adjourned for settlement but it could not be settled. The benefits, whatever may be in accordance with the Rules, the petitioner will get subject to final decision of the petition.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Mrs. Indira S. Salunkhe
The President, Shri Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
