Allowed
Udyavara Raghvendra Acharya and Anr. v. Swarna Kapoor Alias Zariwala
Bombay HCCAW/831/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caw831.10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 831 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1812 OF 2009
Udyavara Raghvendra Acharya
....Applicant.
Vs
Ms. Swarna Kapoor & Zariwala
....Respondent.
Mr. R.M. Nakhawa i/by Mr. Vasant Dhawan for the Applicant. Ms. Pooja Shroff i/by M/s. Jhangiani Narula & Associates for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 4th MAY, 2010
P.C.:
1 Considering the order already passed, I am inclined to grant prayer
clause (b). The Civil Application is accordingly allowed. However, the liberty is granted to the Respondents to apply for appropriate order/ modification, if any.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Udyavara Raghvendra Acharya
Ms. Swarna Kapoor & Zariwala
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court