Civil application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel was absent and no one represented the applicant when the matter was called out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2878 OF 2009 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1990 OF 2007
Sacchidanand G. Rawool. ... Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... ... Respondents.
None present for the Applicant. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 28th JANUARY, 2010.
P. C.:
Learned Counsel for the applicant absent. Nobody present on behalf
of the applicant when the matter is called out. Hence, the civil application
is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/
Sd/
Sacchidanand G. Rawool
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
D. D. Sinha
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
