The High Court in Civil Application no. 2463 of 2010 restored a writ petition to file that had been dismissed for default, disposed of the civil application, and heard counsel for the applicant, AGP, and respondent no. 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
srp
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2463 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2159 OF 2010.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or Court’s or Judge’s orders. directions & Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Tejasweeta Kadam i/b R. D. Suryawanshi for the applicant.
Mr. S. N. Patil, AGP.
Mr. A. M. Savgave i/b S. S. Patwardhan for R-3.
Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : September 24, 2010.
P. C. :
the writ petition which was dismissed for default, may be restored to file. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent no.3. For the reasons stated in the application, writ petition is restored to file. Civil application is disposed of.
(R.V. More, J.) (Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition dismissed for default may be restored to file.
The Applicant
The Respondents
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
