The High Court held that with the disposal of the underlying Writ Petition, no substantive matter remains for adjournment, and disposed of the Civil Application accordingly.
The Civil Application was disposed of as nothing survived with the disposal of the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw2061-10
1
upa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2061 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5575 OF 2010
Neha Rajendra Panchal and others
).. Applicants
Versus
Union of India and others
).. Respondents
Mr. V.M. Thorat a/w Mrs.Neeta Masurkar and Mrs.Minal Pankar for the Applicants.
Mr. A.J. Rana, Senior Advocate, with Mr. S.S. Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
P. C. :
In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survives in the present Civil Application and the same is disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Neha Rajendra Panchal and others
Union of India and others
MOHIT S. SHAH
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
