Four civil applications were disposed of along with parent writ petitions. Upon disposal of the writ petitions, these civil applications could not survive and were disposed accordingly.
Consequential civil applications disposed of as writ petitions disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
srk
1
ca-1185-07.sxw
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1185 OF 2007 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5919 OF 2002
Naresh Surajaram Mestri Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
... Petitioner
... Respondents
ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2015 OF 2005 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5918 OF 2002
Gauri Vijaykumar Doijad ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents
ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1184 OF 2007 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5917 OF 2002
Nikhil Arvind Nandgaonkar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents
Ms. Pooja Thorat for the petitioners. Mr. R.P. Behere, Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. R.S. Khadapkar for respondent No.3. Mr. R.S. Nerlekar respondent No.4.
srk
2
ca-1185-07.sxw
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.J. KATHAWALLA , J. Friday, December 10, 2010
P.C.
In view of disposal of writ petitions, civil applications do not survive and the same are disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
Naresh Surajaram Mestri
Gauri Vijaykumar Doijad
Nikhil Arvind Nandgaonkar
State of Maharashtra
Mohit S. Shah
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
