This order notes the filing of a letters patent appeal. The court condonsed a 12-day delay, permitted the appeal to be listed, and disposed of the application regarding the delay.
Delay of 12 days condoned; appeal listed for admission hearing on 23rd August, 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
１
srk
ca-222-10
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2010 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 18408 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2805 OF 2010
Sou. Manisha Sanjay Waskar Versus Shri Anil @ Bajirao Balaso Dhavan (Panari) and others.
... Applicant
... Respondents
Mr.S. Aney, senior advocate with Mr. Rahul Kulkarni for the applicant. Mr. A.I. Patel, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.5. Mr.Chetan Patil for respondent No.1.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Wednesday, August 11, 2010
P.C.
Having heard the learned advocate for the respondent No.1 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.5 and in absence of any opposition from respondent Nos.2 to 4 who are served, we find that sufficient cause is shown for delay of 12 days in filing the appeal.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Sou. Manisha Sanjay Waskar
Shri Anil @ Bajirao Balaso Dhavan (Panari)
others
Mohit S. Shah
S.C. Dharmadikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
