In a civil revision application regarding a decree for possession, the High Court allowed restoration. Execution of the decree was stayed for four weeks to allow the respondent to appear.
Application allowed on prayer clause (a); decree for possession stay for four weeks; show appearance of respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca 488-2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 488 OF 2010
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 641 OF 2009
Shri Satish Ganpati Vhatkar...Applicant
vs.
Shri Dattatray Govind Kadam...Respondent
Mr.Saurabh M. Railkar for the Applicant.
Mr.S.M. Mirajkar for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 27, 2010
P.C. :-
1Heard Advocate for the applicant and
Advocate for the respondent.
2In view of the averments made in the
application, a case for restoration is made out.
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause
(a). Registry is directed to show appearance of
2 ca 488-2010
Advocate for the respondent. Decree for possession
shall not be executed for a period of four weeks
from today.
(A.S. OKA, J.)
Shri Satish Ganpati Vhatkar
Shri Dattatray Govind Kadam
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court