Laxman Ramesh Govindwar v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CA/9190/2010 LAXMAN V/S STATE
- Heard Shri Bayas, learned Advocate for the applicant and Shri Phatake, learned AGP for respondents / State authorities. Shri Bayas, points out the order dt. 19.6.2008 passed by this Court.
- Writ Petitions for final hearing from 2001 and onwards are assigned to this Court. Present writ petition pertains to year of 2002.
- Application stands disposed of. Registry to list the petition for final hearing in its chronological order. No order as to costs.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.23.8.2010 akl
Parties & counsel
- appellant
LAXMAN
- respondent
STATE
Coram
K.U.CHANDIWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court