The High Court at Aurangabad Bench adjourned the application for early hearing of a writ petition, refusing precedence over current 2001-02 petitions. It was disposed of to be fixed for final hearing chronologically.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6386 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1610 OF 2005
Smt. Ranu d/o Rakhmaji Muley
...Applicant
VERSUS
The High Court of Judicature of Bombay, (through its Registrar) Mumbai & ors. ...Respondents
Shri Ajay Kanawade, advocate holding for Shri S.B.Talekar, advocate for the applicant (original petitioner) Shri S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH
AND
SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ.
DATED : 22nd October, 2010
PER COURT :
2
3 However, presently, we are hearing the petitions of the year 2001-02 and there is no necessity to give precedence to the said petition. Hence, present petition be fixed for final hearing chronologically and present application stands disposed of accordingly.
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.)
dbm/ca6386.10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant's application for early hearing of Writ Petition No. 1610 of 2005 should be given precedence over petitions of the year 2001-02.
Smt. Ranu d/o Rakhmaji Muley
The High Court of Judicature of Bombay, (through its Registrar) Mumbai
S.B. DESHMUKH
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court