The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad, allowed a civil application to admit an applicant to intervene in Writ Petition No. 8051 of 2009.
The civil application was allowed and the applicant was permitted to intervene in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 495 OF 2010
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8051 OF 2009
Dattatraya S/o Dnyaneshwar Zende .... APPLICANT
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS
Mr. K.M.Nagarkar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. K.J.Ghute Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. A. S. Shelke, Advocate for respondent no. 6.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 23/04/2010
PER COURT :
knp/CA 495.10 in WP 8051.09
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be permitted to intervene in a pending writ petition.
Dattatraya Zende
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.Hardas
S.V.Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
