Disposed
Shevantabai R Bhaskar v. State of Mah.
Bombay HCCA/3733/1995
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3733 OF 1995 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 264 OF 1989
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 14.07.2010
1.Heard Adv. Shri S.S. Kulkarni
for the applicant. No one is present
for the respondents. The reason given
for delay in the application is that
the degree of the First Appellate Court
did not reflect addition of legal
representatives of respondent No.13.
Since, now the decree is amended, the
legal representatives of respondent No.
13 are allowed to be brought on record.
The amendment be carried out forthwith.
After the amendment, issue notices to
the added respondents.
2.The Civil Application stands
disposed of.
snk/2010/JUL10/ca3733.95
Applicant
Respondent No. 13 and Legal Representatives
P.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court