The bench disposed of a civil application and appeal filed by an original claimant condoning delay, noting the matter was already dismissed against the vehicle owner against whom the enforcement proceeds would lie.
Appeal and application disposed of as they did not survive against the Insurance Company.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3125 OF 2009 WITH FIRST APEAL ST.NO.4400 OF 2009
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 05.05.2010
None present for the applicant.
This is an application for condonation
of 342 days delay, filed by the
original claimant. The application is
already dismissed against the owner of
the vehicle. In view of that, the
appeal and application do not survive
against the remaining respondent which
is Insurance Company. Hence, the appeal
and application stand disposed of as
such.
sut/MAY10/ca3125.09
P.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court