Ramkrishna Pandurang Malwade and Anr. v. Avinash Sureshrao Kumtekar
Bombay HCCA/2916/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2916 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 4389 OF 2010
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 03.05.2010
1.Adv. Shri D.R. Kadam h/f.
Adv. Shri Y.R. Barahate for the
applicant and Adv. Shri M.P. Tripathi
for respondent No.1 are present.
Considering the reasons given in para 2
of the application, the delay of 41
days deserves to be considered. Hence,
theapplicationallowed;delay
condoned. TheFirstAppealbe
registered.
[P.R. BORKAR,J.]
snk/2010/MAY10/ca2916.10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 41-day delay in filing the application warrants condonation.
Adv. Shri D.R. Kadam
Adv. Shri M.P. Tripathi
P.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court