The High Court at Aurangbad allowed an application to condone a 335-day delay in filing a request to set aside an order refusing registration of a second appeal. The impugned order was quashed.
The order refusing registration of the second appeal is quashed and set aside; delay is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2494 OF 2010
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders |
CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2010
1 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 335 days occurred in presenting the application for setting aside order passed by the Registrar on 4-3-2009.
2 Heard Mr. Mandlik, learned senior counsel for the applicants. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Order passed by the Registrar on 4-3-2009 refusing registration of the second appeal stands quashed and set aside. Delay occurred in presenting the application stands condoned. Civil
2
application stands disposed of.
3 Applicants to remove office objections within two weeks from today.
( R. M. BORDE, J.)
dyb / office /ca2494.10.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 335 days in presenting the application for setting aside the Registrar's order can be condoned.
Applicants
R. M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
