The High Court allowed a civil application seeking withdrawal of an ongoing Family Court Appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and any interim relief was vacated.
Civil Application allowed; Family Court Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Interim relief vacated; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 12811 OF 2010 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.: 23 OF 2001
***
1.We have heard learned counsel Mr.
Bipinchandra K. Patil, holding for Mr. Hemant
Survey, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant and learned counsel Mr. S. M.
Kulkarni who appears for the Respondent/
sole.
2.By this civil Application, applicant
seeks withdrawal of the appeal itself. Civil
application accordingly is allowed in terms
of prayer clause (A) and disposed of.
3.In view of this, Family Court Appeal No.
23 of 2001 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. No
costs.
[SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dated:20/10/2010.
ans/12811
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application seeking withdrawal of the appeal should be allowed.
Appellant
Respondent
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
S.B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court