Maruti Pandurang Surnar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Civil Application No. 1165 of 1998 WITH
Civil Application No. 8099 of 2010
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.Milind Patil Beedkar, Advocate for the applicant Smt. S.D. Shelke, AGP for the respondent / State
PER COURT :
- Heard.
- Both the Civil Application are allowed for the reasons mentioned in it.
- Delay of 224 days caused in filing the first appeal is condoned.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Surayyabegum Syed Isaq and Ors.
Pandhari Kerba Wadjkar and Ors. Vs Bhusaheb Mukundrao Hakke and Ors.
Maruti M.Karad(Died)Lrs Shivabai M.Karad and Ors. Vs Dagadusaheb Santoba Satbhai Andanr
Dilipkumar Raghunath Pandhare and Others. Vs Saibai Bhimaji Kadam and 4 Others