The High Court dismissed Civil Application No. 10148 of 2009 as withdrawn by the applicant, appearing in person after counsel's statement.
None granted; civil application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10148 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.258 OF 2009
Sou.Alka w/o Chintaman Palkhe APPLICANT VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.Vijay Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr.K.G.Ghute Patil, AGP for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.S.V.Natu, Advocate for respondent No.5
[CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.]
DATE : 20th January 2010
PER COURT:
[A.V.POTDAR, J.]
[P.V.HARDAS, J.]
drp/A10/ca10148-09
Soulka w/o Chintaman Palkhe
The State of Maharashtra
others
P.V. Hardas
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
