The High Court at Bombay dismissed this arbitration petition for default as the petitioner failed to comply with a conditional order despite multiple adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 arbp754.09.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 754 OF 2009
M/s. R.K. Textile ....Petitioner.
Vs.
Karvy Contrade Ltd. ....Respondent.
None present.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 25th October, 2010
P.C.:
None for the Petitioner, on 22nd January, 2010, 8th March, 2010, 10th August, 2010, 6th September, 2010. Matter is called out thrice today. It appears that in spite of conditional order dated 10th August, 2010, no compliance has been made. None for the Petitioner again. Dismissed for default.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
M/s. R.K. Textile
Karvy Contrade Ltd.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
