invoke the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (for short “Act”), such order of rejection as applicant seeking information, just cannot be agitated or treated as interim award/final order as contemplated under Section 34 of the Act. The submission is that there is no other remedy available to the parties against such order passed by the Arbitrator, appointed under section 84 of the M.S.C.S Act. Without going to the merits of that aspect in the present facts and circumstances, I therefore, see no reason to interfere with the order so passed in view of clear provisions and the reasoning so given. No one can ask informations unless specifically permitted under the provisions of the MSCS Act. Even otherwise the inspection, except the informations which are necessary for proper adjudication of the dispute, so raised cannot be extended to roving inquiry or general informations other than necessary. It is rightly observed that the petitioner cannot be permitted to go beyond section 108 read with sections 106 and 107 of the M. S.C. S. Act. I see there is no perversity and/or illegality in the order. The petition is rejected. No order as to costs.
