Pluto Shipping Ltd. v. Western India Shipyard Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ARBAP60-10=3.9
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2010
Pluto Shipping Ltd. Vs.
Western India Shipyard Ltd.
..Applicant.
..Respondent.
Mr.S.C. Naidu with Mr. Y.C. Naidu, Mr. Saurabh Kulkarni and Mr. T.R. Yadav i/b C.R. Naidu & Co. for the Applicant.
Mr. Rahul Narichania with Mr. Anil Jarial, Mrs. Shwani Bhaduria and Mr. Ankur Kashyap i/b Juris Corp for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 3 September 2010.
P.C . :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Respondent
state that parties have agreed to the appointment of Mr. Justice M.S. Rane, Former Judge of this Court as sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 to determine and adjudicate upon all the disputes and differences between the parties. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant states that in view thereof the Applicant withdraws the earlier nomination. In view of the statement which has been made by the parties, no further directions are necessary. The sole arbitrator shall constitute the
2
ARBAP60-10=3.9
PNP
arbitral tribunal in supercession of Clause 41 of the agreement by consent. In view of the statement which has been made by the parties, the Arbitration
Application is disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
Pluto Shipping Ltd.
Western India Shipyard Ltd.
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court