Allowed an application for substituted service of notice to respondent nos. 7 and 8 and extended the return date for service on respondent no. 3 simultaneously granting the application.
Substituted service to respondent nos. 7 and 8 granted within seven weeks; return date for service to respondent no. 3 extended to 21.12.2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cr-appw-435-10
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 435 OF 2010 IN
CRI. W.P.NO. 468 OF 2010
Shri. Rishi Kumar ..Applicant Vs. The R.B.I. and Ors. ..Respondents
Ms. Ameya Gokhale i/b m/s. Khaitan and Co. for applicant Mr. K.Noorani for Mr. Satish Mane-Shinde for Respondents Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2010
P.C. :
1 Heard the learned advocates for the applicant. For the reasons stated in the application, prayer for substituted service in relation to respondent nos. 7 and 8 is granted. The same be done within seven weeks. Returnable date for service of notice to respondent
no.3 is extended till 21.12.2010.
2 Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (c-i) and (cii).
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
Shri. Rishi Kumar
The R.B.I. and Ors.
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
