Single judge ordered sufficient cause for restoring a criminal writ petition to file, allowing restoration of the original appeal. The application before the bench was disposed of without detailed reasoning.
Cri. Appeal No. 523 of 2002 restored to file to be heard in due course.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 crappw4310
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 43 OF 2010 IN
CRI.W.P NO. 523 OF 2002
Shankar Dattatray Ingawale ..Applicant Vs. Rajashree Shankar Ingawale and Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Amit Seth i/b Amit B.Borkar Adv. for applicant Smt. U.V.Kejariwal APP for State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 04, 2010
P.C. :
1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant. None appears for respondent no.1 though served.
2 Sufficient cause has been made out for restoration of Cri. W.P. No. 523 of 2002. Hence, Cri. Appeal No. 523 of 2002 is restored to file and be placed for hearing in due course.
3 Application is disposed of.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
Shankar Dattatray Ingawale
Rajashree Shankar Ingawale and Anr.
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
