The court held that a criminal application became infructuous due to the disposal of the underlying writ petition on the same day and disposed of the matter.
The application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1b. cr appa 38310.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1742 OF 2009
Rajendra Vitthal Raut.. Applicant
Vs
The State of Maharashtra.. Respondent
And
Parmeshwar Jalinder Manjre.. Intervener
Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. V.V. Purwant for the
Applicant
Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State
Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Intervener
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J
RESERVED ON : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2010
PRONOUNCED ON: 27th OCTOBER, 2010
P.C.:
1.In view of the order passed today in Criminal Writ
Petition No. 1742 of 2009, this application is infructuous
and is disposed of as such.
[SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]
1
1b. cr appa 38310.doc
2
Rajendra Vitthal Raut
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court