Hon'ble Court restored the impugned writ petition (WP No. 1206 of 2009) to file upon finding sufficient cause and disposed of the subsequent application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19a. cr appw 358-10.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2010 IN
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1206 OF 2009
Y. Kunjappan & Anr
.. Applicants
Vs
Chitralekha Tarachand Anandi & Ors.. Respondents
Mr. Robert C. Sequira for the Applicants
Ms. N.A. Asadi for Respondent No. 1
Mr. S.J. Panikar for Respondent No. 3
Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J
DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2010.
P.C.:
1. Heard.
2. Sufficient cause has been made out for restoration of Cri. Writ Petition No. 1206 of 2009, hence, Cri. Writ Petition No. 1206 of 2009 is restored to file.
3. Application is disposed of.
[SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]
1
19a. cr appw 358-10.doc
2
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court