The High Court at Nagpur restored Criminal Appeal No. 506/09 to the file, finding sufficient reasons under the application, and closed the matter with no substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.50 of 2010
(In Cri. Appln. No. 506/09)
Indrajeetsingh s/o Motisingh Rajput ...Versus... Sau. Sangeeta w/o Indrajeetsingh Rajput & anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
[Shri R.K. Dhande Adv. for applicant.
CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 22.02.2010
None appears for respondents though served. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that good and sufficient reasons exist to restore the application. Hence Cri. Appln. No. 506/09 is restored to file. C.A. disposed of.
JUDGE
/TA/
Indrajeetsingh s/o Motisingh Rajput
Sau. Sangeeta w/o Indrajeetsingh Rajput
Other Respondent
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
