A criminal application for pre-arrest bail against charges of criminal breach of trust involving unauthorised electronic transfers from a bank account was rejected by the single judge, who held that custodial interrogation was necessary due to the technical complexity of the case.
Rejection of the application for pre-arrest bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Prakash Naik for the applicant. Mr. Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 15TH JANUARY 2010
P.C. :
pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.415 of 2009 registered with Pimpri Police Station, District Pune.
2
personal account by electronic means. He then transferred another sum of Rs.3 lakhs in similar fashion. The applicant is therefore charged with an offence punishable under section 408 read with 34 of the I.P.C.
3
Hence, the application is rejected.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted in an application under section 408 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. involving electronic transfer of funds.
Whether custodial investigation is necessary to ascertain the hacking in the electronic computer system.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
applicant
State
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
