High Court rejected bail application in murder case. Court held circumstantial evidence strong with extra-judicial confessions. Offence punishable by death or life imprisonment precluded bail.
Bail rejected; application dismissed. Decision at bail stage not to bind Sessions Court at trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4848 of 2009
Sachin Prakash Chaluche ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.V.V. Purwant i/b Prasant Jadhav for the applicant.
Mr. A.S. Gadkari APP for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J.
DATED : 27th January 2010
P.C.
2
away. There is a record of two extra judicial confessions made by the applicant.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant facing charges of murder and attempted murder.
Whether the prima facie evidence connecting the applicant to the crime warrants denial of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Prakash Chaluche
The State of Maharashtra
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
