Criminal Application for bail under Section 439 CrPC rejected as the prima facie case of abduction for prostitution was serious, and applicants had not made a substantial case of false implication.
Bail application rejected; trial to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3246 OF 2010
Deepak Karamsingh Malke & others
APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
RESPONDENT
Mr. K.B. Dantal and Mr. A.M. Nagarkar, advocates for the applicants.
Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for the respondent/State.
[CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.]
[DATE : 27th September, 2010]
PER COURT :
Criminal Procedure Code.
( 2 )
34 of the I.P. Code.
( 3 )
while deciding the case on merits.
[V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE
NPJ/criapln3246-10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail under Section 439 CrPC should be granted in a case involving abduction for prostitution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak Karamsingh Malke & others
The State of Maharashtra
VR. KINGAONKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
