The High Court of Bombay dismissed a Criminal Application for non-prosecution as the applicant was not present when called, with no substantive reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
None present for the applicant. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 18TH JANUARY 2010
P.C. :
prosecution.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
The State
Applicant/State (implied)
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
