The applicant abandoned the criminal application during the hearing, and the High Court rejected it without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
O712appa646.10.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 646 OF 2010 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 348 OF 2010
(Ashok Hanumanta Dhurve Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. A. G. Joshi, Advocate (appointed) for the applicant.
Mrs. S. S. Jachak, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 07 DECEMBER, 2010.
Heard.
In the midst of hearing Mr. Joshi for the
applicant (appointed) states that he does not press this application.
Application is rejected,
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Ashok Hanumanta Dhurve
State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
A. R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
