Fahim Arshad Ansari S/O Mohd. Yusuf Ansari v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Noted application submitted by counsel for accused was not pressed; matter disposed of casually.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1206 OF 2010 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 606 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr. R. B.Mokashi for the applicant. Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP.
Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : October 6, 2010.
P. C. :
(Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.)
(R.V. More, J.)
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court