The Bombay High Court condoned the 109-day delay in filing a criminal appeal due to the pendency of the confirmation case.
Condonation of a 109-day delay in filing a criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-CRI-APPA1202.10*
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1202 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.725 OF 2010
Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid.
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents
Mr. Amin Solkar for the applicant.
Mr. Ujjwal Nikam, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. S.R. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & R.V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2010.
P.C.:-
Solkar, learned counsel for the applicant submits that for the reasons stated in the application, delay may be condoned. Mr. Nikam, learned Special Public Prosecutor opposes grant of this application on the ground that no
29-CRI-APPA1202.10*
AJN
2
substantial cause is made out for condoning the delay.
[MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
[R.V. MORE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a 109-day delay in filing a criminal appeal warrants condonation.
Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
R.V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
