Appeal against an order directing status-quo was disposed of by remitting the Notice of Motion for further hearing before the Single Judge to confirm or vacate ad-interim relief.
Directions to Registry to notify Notice of Motion; ad-interim relief to remain till 24th February 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.90 OF 2010 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3766 OF 2009 IN
S.C.SUIT NO.2716 OF 2009
Mr. Ramesh Nagesh Sangekar V/s.
... Appellant
Mr. Kishor Nagesh Sangekar and others. ... Respondents
Ms. A. Wandrewala with Mr. Akshay Vani for the appellant. Mr. M.L. Palan with Mr. A.G. Revankar i/by M/s. A.G. Revankar & Co. for the respondents.
CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, CHIEF JUSTICE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C.
Being aggrieved by the order dated 4th February, 2010, whereby
the parties have been directed to maintain status-quo, this appeal has been filed. As per the impugned order, the notice of motion was kept for further hearing on 15th February, 2010, without looking into the facts of the case.
been granted by virtue of the impugned order shall remain in operation till 24th February, 2010.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Ramesh Nagesh Sangekar
Kishor Nagesh Sangekar
Anil R. Dave
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
