The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed an appeal against an interlocutory order permitting the amendment of a plaint, while leaving open the substantive issue of the trial judge's findings for future disposal.
Appeal dismissed; no substantive relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
srk
app-L-838-10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODGING) NO.838 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1238 OF 2010 IN
SUIT NO.2105 OF 2007
Shri Mahesh G. Nandani and others. ... Appellants Versus Raja Builders and others. ... Respondents
Mr. M.M. Vashi with Ms. Prachi Khandge i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi Associates for the appellants.
Mr. D.H. Mehta with Ms. A.V. Khanolkar for respondent No.1. Ms. Nita Mandhyan i/by M/s. S.M. Associates for respondent No.2.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
P .C.
The learned counsel for the respondent-original plaintiff raises a preliminary contention that the present appeal is not maintainable.
2
app-L-838-10.sxw
srk
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
Shri Mahesh G. Nandani and others
Raja Builders and others
MOHIT S. SHAH
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
