The appellant, originally convicted, preferred a criminal appeal. However, the Registry reported that the appellant expired on 4th April 2010. The court held that the appeal abates and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2009
Shyamrao Laxman Patil.. Appellant
Vs
The State of Maharashtra.. Respondent
None for the Appellant
Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J
DATE : 25th OCTOBER, 2010.
P.C.:
1. The appellant-original accused no. 1 has preferred this appeal against his conviction.
2. Report of the Registry, City Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai shows that the appellant expired on 4th April 2010. In this view of the matter, the appeal abates and is disposed of as such.
[SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]
1
2
Shyamrao Laxman Patil
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court