Dismissed
Sashikant Shivram Mhatre and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/8694/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court rejected a writ petition challenging land acquisition for a public purpose benefiting the S.T. group, finding no cause for interference, while acknowledging the petitioner may request an alternative site if scientifically viable and cost-free to the State.
What did the court decide?
Petition rejected; no interference. Plaintiff admitted to possibility of requesting alternative site if scientifically valid and without cost to State.