This single-judge writ bench dismissed a petition filed by Anoopsingh Jangwal against the State of Maharashtra. The court held that no case was made out for interference and disposed of the petition without adjudication on merits, directing a representation to be examined only if filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7406 OF 2009
Anoopsingh Jangwal ...Petitioner. v.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.R.K.Mendadkar, adv. For the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP For the Respondents.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 24th November , 2009
P.C.
1 No case is made out for interference. The learned counsel
however, states that he will make representation to the respondent no.2.
If so representation is made, respondent no.2 to consider. The
representation be concerned on own merits and bearing in mind the State
act.
2 With the above observations, the petition stands disposed off.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition warrants any interference.
Anoopsingh Jangwal
State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
