The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition seeking interference with an interlocutory order, holding that the order was supported by cogent reasons and no interference warranted under Article 227 of the Constitution.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6966 OF 2009
_______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } }________
Mr. P.V.Mandlik, Sr. Counsel instructed by Mr. A.S.Gandhi, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. M.V.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent.
[ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 16/12/2009.
PER COURT :
[ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE
knp/WP6966.09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India warrants interference in an interlocutory order supported by cogent reasons.
Petitioners
Respondent
B.R.Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
