Petitioner wishes to withdraw writ petition stating matter settled amicably; court dismisses petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.276 OF 2009
Ram shivaji Bhagat Vs.
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and others.
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. Pratap Singh for the petitioner.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State.
Mr. Firoz Palkhiwala i/by M/s. Soloman & Co. for the applicant in Chamber summons.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
In the praecipe, it is stated that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, therefore, wishes to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Ram shivaji Bhagat
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
others
SWANTANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
