Dismissed
Sar Gems, a Firm v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/604/1981
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition non-prosecuted; dismissed without order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
hvn
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO. 604 OF 1981
¶4
Sur Gems ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Anr. ... Respondents
¶5
None for Petitioner.
¶6
Mr. Rajinder Kumar for Respondents.
¶7
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
¶8
DATED : AUGUST 05, 2009
¶9
P.C.
¶10
When the matter is called out none present. Petition dismissed for non
¶11
prosecution. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
¶12
(D.G. KARNIK,J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sur Gems
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
F.I. Rebello
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri K.J.Sheth L/H of Late Shri J.P.Sheth Bombay Vs the Controller of Estate Duty Bombay City II
6HRI R.N.Mafatlal Vs the Controller of Estate Duty
M.P.Birla, Executor of the Estate of Smt. Shardadevi Birla Vs the Controller of Estate Duty Bombay
Govindbhai Nayanbhai Nagar. Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.