Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous in view of previous dismissal of related petition, ruling that nothing survives.
Rule discharged; petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH
WRIT PETITION NO.557 OF 2005
versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. - - - and others. Respondents
Shri V. J. Dixit, Senior Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri R. P. Phatke, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respondents Nos.2 to 4. Shri A. P. Chavare, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ.
Dated : 12th October 2009
PER COURT:
of as having rendered infructuous. Rule discharged.
( N.D.DESHPANDE, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. )
pnk/wp55705
Moreshwar Kantrao Hattikar
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
B. R. Gavai
N. D. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
