The petitioner filed a writ petition that was found to be infructuous. The High Court discharged the rule without granting interim relief and dismissed the petition.
The rule was discharged. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.552 OF 1999
Narendrajay Metal Converters (P) Ltd.
.. Petitioner
versus
Union of India & ors.
.. Respondents
Mr.H.R. Shetty for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Jetly with Mr.R.B. Pardeshi for respondents.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
DATED : 16th September 2009
P.C:-
A reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents by Mr.P.N. Bachate, Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Gr.VII (Export). In the said affidavit, it
2
is set out that after show cause notice issued to the petitioner, the Commissioner of Customs (EP passed order in original on 13th October 2000.
(D.G. KARNIK, J) (F.I. REBELLO, J)
Narendrajay Metal Converters (P) Ltd.
Union of India
F. I. Repello
D. G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
