The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition against Mr. Haribhau R. Joshi. Finding the facts concurrent and noting the decree was already executed, the judge held no interference was warranted and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as decree was already executed and no interference warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5343 OF 2007
Smt.Gurubai G. Loni & Ors. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
Mr.Haribhau R. Joshi. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for petitioners.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : FEBRUARY 2, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners.
2. In view of the concurrent finding of fact, no
interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is
warranted. Besides, I am informed that the decree is
already executed. Accordingly, Petition fails. The
same is dismissed.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in view of the concurrent finding of fact and execution of the decree.
Smt.Gurubai G. Loni & Ors.
Mr.Haribhau R. Joshi
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court